|
Project |
Description |
Current Status/Findings |
|
Age Differences in the Effects of Poor Contrast on
Reading Strategies Contact Person:
Tracy Mitzner
[back to top] |
This research is directed toward understanding age differences in reading
strategies, particularly those used when text is difficult to read due to poor
contrast (e.g., when dark text is printed on a dark background). Our findings
can guide text writers and designers about factors that facilitate reading for
older adults. |
Our results revealed that older adults were affected to a
greater extent compared to younger adults when reading text that was presented
with poor contrast. Moreover, neither younger nor older adults were able to
compensate for the poor viewing conditions by taking advantage of contextual
information contained in the text.
|
|
|
Presentation/Publication: Mitzner, T. L. & Rogers, W.A. (2006).
Reading in the dark: Effects of age and contrast on reading speed and
comprehension. Human Factors, 48(2) 229-240.
|
|
Project |
Description |
Current Status/Findings |
|
Age Differences in
Technologies Used
Contact Person:
Marita O'Brien
[back to top] |
Previous analysis of the
CREATE I data has shown age differences in the use of
computers and technology. Yet, the studies do not clearly
depict why and when there are age-related differences in
computer and technology use. By reviewing the CREATE II
data, we will describe technology use for older and younger
adults with a focus on technology type, frequency of use,
and domain of use. |
Data is being collected and analyzed.
|
|
|
|
|
Project |
Description |
Current Status/Findings |
|
Designing More Effective Visual Displays Contact Person:
Cara Bailey
[back to top] |
Many different situations require displays that can
encompass a variety of information and display that
information clearly and effectively in a limited display
area. The purpose of this study is to identify and examine
the different design principles that can aid in the
extraction of different types of information from a display
in a complex environment. |
Data collection is underway. |
|
|
|
|
Project |
Description |
Current Status/Findings |
|
Health-care Provider/Patient Communication Contact Person:
Jayme Hickman
[back to top] |
The goal of this study is to understand what kinds
of difficulties people have when they are trying to
communicate with their health care provider (e.g.,
doctor, nurse, pharmacist). Understanding what
difficulties people have during communication and
how they may solve them will help us understand how
technology can assist in successful communication
between patients and their health care providers. |
Preliminary results indicate that many of the
reported strategies used by older adults are
implemented after a communication failure has
occurred. The best solution to communication
problems is in the realm of prevention rather then
correction. Currently we are developing guidelines
to assist older adults in the prevention of
communication problems. |
|
|
Presentation/Publication: Hickman, J.M.,
Pak, R., Stronge, A.J., & Jones, W.B. (2004).
Exploring Communication
between Health Care Professionals and Older Adults.
Paper presented at the
Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48th Annual Meeting, New Orleans. |
|
Project |
Description |
Current Status/Findings |
|
Effect of Perceived Consequence on Automation
Reliance Contact Person:
Neta Ezer
[back to top] |
This project looks at the factors that influence
peoples' trust in automation, specifically the type
of automation known as a decision aid, which
gives the person a suggested action that the person
can decide to follow or not follow. This choice, to
agree or not agree with the decision aid's
suggestion, may be influenced by what is at risk if
the suggestion is wrong and a mistake is made.
It may also be influenced by the costs involved in
seeking out additional information that could
confirm or disconfirm what the decision aid is
suggesting. Essentially, the person must balance the
benefits and costs of following the suggestion of
the decision aid versus not following it. The
results of this study could potentially guide the
design of automation placed in high-risk situations
so that people will be able to use the automation
appropriately. |
Preliminary results suggest that people tend to have
more trust in their own abilities, rather than in
the abilities of a decision aid, when there is a
relatively high cost of making a mistake. When the
cost of checking an aid's suggestion is high, people
tend to agree with the suggestion of the aid more
frequently.
|
|
|
Presentation/Publications:
Ezer N., Fisk, A.D., & Rogers, W.A. (2005). The
Effect of perceived consequence on automation
reliance in a human-automation collaborative system.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics
Society 49th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA:
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Sanchez, J., Ezer, N., Rogers, W.A., & Fisk, A.D.
(2005). Designing collaborative environments for
older adults. Human Computer Interaction
International. Las Vegas, NV. |
|
Project |
Description |
Current Status/Findings |
|
Knowledge Modification Contact Person:
Anne Adams
[back to top] |
Research has shown that over time, we tend to revert to
old-held beliefs in light of new information which
contradict our beliefs. With this study we investigated
whether this reversal trend will also be observed when the
initial information is only recently acquired. The goal is
to determine interventions that will counteract and enhance
recall of new, contradicting information when this becomes
important, as for example, we receive new information from
health care professionals about how to treat an illness. |
Current results suggest that much of the contradiction was
retained by both younger and older adults. However, some of
the initial information resurfaced and more so for older
adults than younger adults. Interestingly, both age groups
did recall a combined version of old and new information. |
|
|
Presentation/Publication: Anne E.
Adams, C. Travis Bowles, Ki C. Choi, Wendy A.
Rogers, & Arthur D. Fisk (2005). The effect of
contradictory information on recently acquired
knowledge. Proceedings of the Human Factors and
Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting. Santa
Monica, CA: Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society. |
Project |
Description |
Current Status/Findings |
|
Privacy in an Aware Home Contact Person:
Kelly Caine
[back to top] |
Older adults in particular stand to benefit from new
technologies that use visual sensing devices to collect and
share information about residents of smart or aware homes
like Georgia
Tech's Aware Home.
However, there is little research that explores the privacy
concerns older adults may have when choosing whether to use
these technologies in their homes. The goal of
this study is to examine any potential privacy concerns that
older adults may have about using visual sensing devices in
their home as well as factors that may mitigate those
concerns. |
Data collection is complete and analysis is underway. |
|
|
Presentation/Publication: Caine, K. E.,
Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2007).
Designing Privacy
Conscious Aware Homes for Older Adults. Proceedings of the Human Factors and
Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting. Santa
Monica, CA: Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society. |
|
Project |
Description |
Current Status/Findings |
|
Role of User Expectations in Human-Automation
Interaction Contact Person:
Andrew Mayer
[back to top] |
As people interact with automated systems they develop general expectations about automation performance, however; it is unclear how these expectations affect reliance. The purpose of this study is to investigate how peoples’
expectations of automation performance influence reliance and how expectations interact with automation errors. More specifically, I am interested in how user reliance changes as a function of level of user expectations, type of automation errors, and time.
|
Data collection is underway. |
|
Project |
Description |
Current Status/Findings |
|
Technology Use by Older Adults
Contact Person: Tracy Mitzner
[back to top] |
Technology has the potential to improve the quality of life
of older adults and to provide support for age-associated declines. We are
conducting focus groups to better understand the needs and preferences of older
adults concerning technology and technology training. The focus groups are being conducted at three
sites: Georgia Institute of Technology, Florida State University,
and University of Miami. We are asking older adults which technology items they use and the frequency
with which they use them, what they like and dislike about each item, what type
of training they think is best for each item, for what tasks they need
training, and what methods of training they think would be useful to learn each
task. Our goal is to gather information about older adults’ experiences with
technology in their everyday lives to provide a basis for research to examine
potential technology design and training improvements.
|
We found that older adults are using a
wide variety of technologies, particularly in their homes.
Moreover, older adults reported more likes than dislike of
technology. The most frequent reasons provided for liking
technology included convenience, features, and support for
activities. The most frequent reasons reported for
disliking technology included inconvenience and concerns
about security and reliability. The likes and dislikes
reported by older adults in this study can be used by
designers to make technologies that are more apt to meet the
needs and preferences of older adults thereby making
technology adoption more likely.
The training data are currently in the
analysis stage. |
|
|
Presentation/Publications: Mitzner, T. L.,
Adams, A., Argüelles, T., Bailey, C. L., Boron, J.
B., Lee, C. C., Weitz, J. R., Charness, N., Czaja,
S. J., Dijkstra, K., Fisk, A. D., Rogers, & W.A.,
Sharit, J. (2006, August). Technology use by
older adults. Presented at the 114th Annual
Convention of the American Psychological
Association. New Orleans, LA.
Fausset, C. B., Mitzner, T. L.,
Adams, A., Boron, J. B., Dijkstra, K., Charness, N.,
Argüelles, T., Lee, C. C., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A.
D. (2007, August). Technology use by older adults
in the work domain. Presented at the 115th
Annual Convention of the American Psychological
Association. San Francisco, CA.
Mitzner, T. L., Boron, J. B.,
Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2007, November).
Older adults’ attitudes toward health-related
technology use. Presented at the Gerontological
Society of America 60th Annual Meeting. San
Francisco, CA.
Mitzner, T. L., Adams, A. E.,
Boron, J. B., Fausset, C. B., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk,
A. D. (2008, April). Understanding older adults’
attitudes about technology use in the home.
Presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference 2008.
Atlanta, GA. |
|
|
Project |
Description |
Current Status/Findings |
|
Training and Understanding the Structure of the System
Contact Person: Jamye Hickman
[back to top] |
While living and working in today's high-tech world, the
ability to perform tasks and understand the system structure
of technology may affect our lives in many ways. For
example, calibrating a medical device such as a blood
glucose meter may be performed only infrequently but an
adequate knowledge of the system structure may be critical
for doing it correctly. The goal of this project is to
understand how training effects learning and an
understanding of the system structure. With the
ever-increasing prevalence of these complex systems in
everyday domains such as medical care, communication,
transportation, and entertainment, understanding the system
structure may potentially result in a better quality of
life. |
The first study in this project is complete. The results
suggests that training providing directions about general
system concepts may lead to the development of a better
understanding of the system structure compared to training
focused on specific system procedures. The second study is
in the planning stage. |
|
|
Presentation/Publication: Hickman, J. M., Rogers, W.A.
& Fisk, A.D. (2003). Age-related effects of
training on developing a system representation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics
Society 47th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA:
Human Factors and
Ergonomics Society. |
|
Project |
Description |
Current Status/Findings |
|
Understanding Inferences Contact Person:
Anne Adams
[back to top] |
The goal of this study is to understand how people of
different ages approach the task of understanding and
evaluating short text passages. |
Data collection is underway. |
|
Project |
Description |
Current Status/Findings |
|
Virtual Keyboard Design Contact Person:
Marita O'Brien
[back to top]
|
Although entering text may seem like an ordinary and simple
task, it can be quite complicated to do with the variety of
devices that have been
introduced into our everyday lives. We are interested in
helping designers keep this task effortless by better understanding the factors involved in text entry when using
a novel device. |
Study 1: We found that the compatibility between
keyboard shape and input device facilitates good
movement performance. Visual search performance was
best on the Alphabetic arrangement across age groups
and keyboard shapes. Letter arrangement affected
visual search performance when the shape was
familiar with that performance. Interestingly, older
adults and younger adults differed in how shape
affected their performance.
Study 2: Neither shape was faster, but results
suggest that more salient features on one shape
facilitated performance, particularly for older
adults. |
|
|
Presentation/Publications:
O’Brien, M.A., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D.
(October, 2006). Text entry on a virtual
keyboard: Evaluating shape and practice effects.
Proceedings of the 50th annual meeting of the
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, San
Francisco, CA.
O’Brien, M.A., Rogers, W.A., & Fisk, A.D.
(2005). Examining keyboard shape and arrangement
effects for younger and older adults.
Proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Orlando,
FL.
O’Brien, M.A. (2004), Keyboard shape and
arrangement effects on keyboard design elements.
Proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, New
Orleans, LA. |
|
|