| |
Adult Cognition Lab
654 Cherry Street, N.W.
School of Psychology
Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, GA 30332-0170
(404) 894-7450
(404) 894-3155
Email Us
|
Aging & Skill Acquisition Article List
To view the full paper you will need Adobe
Acrobat Reader

Due to copyright restrictions you will also need a password to view the
full paper and any applicable supplementary materials. To request one
please Email Us.
Papers:
Touron, D. R., & Hertzog, C. (2009). Age differences in strategic behavior during a computation-based skill acquisition task.
Psychology and Aging.

Abstract

The present experiment evaluated mechanistic and metacognitive accounts of
age differences in strategy transitions during skill acquisition. Old and
young participants were trained on a task involving a shift from performing
a novel arithmetic algorithm to responding via associative recognition of
equation-solution pairings. The strategy shift was manipulated by task
instructions that either (a) equally focused on speed and accuracy, (b)
encouraged retrieval use as a method toward fast responding, or (c)
offered monetary incentives for fast retrieval-based performance.
Monetary incentives produced a more rapid shift to retrieval relative
to standard instructions; older adults showed a greater incentives effect
on retrieval use than younger adults. Monetary incentives encouraged
retrieval use and RT improvements despite accuracy costs (a speed-accuracy
tradeoff). The pattern of results suggested a role of metacognitive and
volitional factors in retrieval shift, indicating that an associative
learning deficit cannot fully account for older adults’ delayed strategy shift.
View
Full Paper (.pdf) 814 kb [Available
through Internet Explorer 5.0 and higher or Netscape 7.1 only]
Request a paper copy
When you click the link,
your preferred email client such as Outlook or Thunderbird
will open. Please include your name and a method for us to contact you
in all correspondence.
Touron, D. R., Swaim, E. T., & Hertzog, C. (2007). Moderation of
older adults' retrieval reluctance through task instructions and
monetary incentives. Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological
Sciences and Social Sciences, 62(3), P149-P155.

Abstract

Previous research
using a noun-pair lookup task indicates that older adults delay strategy
shift from visual scanning to memory retrieval despite adequate
learning, and that this "retrieval reluctance" is related to subjective
choice factors. Age differences in spontaneous response criteria, with
older adults valuing accuracy and young adults valuing speed, might
account for this phenomenon. The present experiment manipulates
instructions and reward contingencies to test the flexibility of
response criteria and strategy preferences. Task instructions conditions
equally focused on speed and accuracy, encouraged retrieval use as a
method toward fast responding, or offered monetary incentives for fast
retrieval-based performance. Results indicate that older adults in the
incentives condition shifted to retrieval earlier than those without
incentives, bolstering the argument that reliance on retrieval is
volitional.
View
Full Paper (.pdf) 814 kb [Available
through Internet Explorer 5.0 and higher or Netscape 7.1 only]
Request a paper copy
When you click the link,
your preferred email client such as Outlook or Thunderbird
will open. Please include your name and a method for us to contact you
in all correspondence.
Hertzog, C., Touron, D. R., & Hines, J. C. (2007). Does a
time-monitoring deficit influence older adults' delayed retrieval shift
during skill acguisition? Psychology and Aging 22(3), 607-624.

Abstract

The authors evaluated age-related time-monitoring deficits and their contribution to
older adults' reluctance to shift to memory retrieval in the noun-pair
lookup (NP) task. Older adults (M = 67 years) showed slower rates of
response time (RT) improvements than younger adults (M = 19 years),
because of a delayed strategy shift. Older adults estimated scanning
latencies as being faster than they actually were and showed poor
resolution in discriminating short from long RTs early in practice. The
difference in estimated RT for retrieval and scanning strategies
predicted retrieval use, independent of actual RT differences. Separate
scanning and recognition memory tasks revealed larger time-monitoring
differences for older adults than in the NP task. Apparently, the
context of heterogeneous RTs as a result of strategy use in the NP task
improved older adults' accuracy of RT estimates. RT feedback had complex
effects on time-monitoring accuracy, although it generally improved
absolute and relative accuracy of RT estimates. Feedback caused older
adults to shift more rapidly to the retrieval strategy in the NP task.
Results suggest that deficient time monitoring plays a role in older
adults' delayed retrieval shift, although other factors (e.g.,
confidence in the retrieval strategy) also play a role.
View
Full Paper (.pdf) 814 kb [Available
through Internet Explorer 5.0 and higher or Netscape 7.1 only]
Request a paper copy
When you click the link,
your preferred email client such as Outlook or Thunderbird
will open. Please include your name and a method for us to contact you
in all correspondence.
Touron, D. & Hertzog, C. (2004). Distinguishing age
differences in knowledge, strategy use, and confidence during strategic
skill acquisition. Psychology and Aging, 19, 452-466.

Abstract

We examined how age differences in strategy selection are related to associative learning
deficits and metacognitive variables, including memory ability confidence. In Experiment 1,
increases in memory reliance for performance of the noun-pair lookup task were compared to
increases in noun-pair memory ability. In Experiment 2, memory reliance was assessed for
noun-pairs memorized prior to the task. In each experiment, older adults manifested a
substantial delay in transition to a retrieval-based strategy despite comparable noun-pair
knowledge. In Experiment 3, young and older adults reported comparable confidence ratings
for the accuracy of each memory probe response. However, older adults reported lower
confidence in their general ability to use the memory retrieval strategy, which correlated with
avoidance of the retrieval strategy. Age deficits in associative learning mechanisms are not
sufficient to account for age differences in strategy shift or in rates of noun-pair performance
improvements.
View
Full Paper (.pdf) 814 kb [Available
through Internet Explorer 5.0 and higher or Netscape 7.1 only]
Request a paper copy
When you click the link,
your preferred email client such as Outlook or Thunderbird
will open. Please include your name and a method for us to contact you
in all correspondence.
Touron, D. & Hertzog, C. (2004). Strategy Shift Affordance and
Strategy Choice in Young and Older Adults. Memory & Cognition, 32,
298-312.

Abstract

When skill acquisition involves a shift in
strategy (such as from rule-based to retrieval-based processing), older
adults typically shift later in practice than young adults. We observed
the shift from scanning-based to memory-based processing in a noun-pair
learning task. Young and older adults were trained in conditions where
the relationship between memory load and scanning load was manipulated
by making the strategy shift more or less beneficial. Older adults
in a condition with high shift affordance shifted to memory retrieval
more fully and more rapidly than did older adults in a conditions with
lower shift affordance. Reluctance to rely on memory retrieval was
related to metacognitive reports of memory confidence. The present study
indicates that age differences in skill acquisition reflect qualitative
differences in strategy choice in addition to quantitative differences
in component task ability.
View
Full Paper (.pdf) 251 kb [Available
through Internet Explorer 5.0 and higher or Netscape 7.1 only]
Request a paper copy
When you click the link,
your preferred email client such as Outlook or Thunderbird
will open. Please include your name and a method for us to contact you
in all correspondence.
Rogers, W. A., Hertzog, C., & Fisk, A. D. (2000). An
individual differences analysis of ability and strategy influences:
Age-related differences in associative learning. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 359-394.

Abstract

The relationships among abilities, strategies, and
performance on an associative learning task were investigated for young
(aged 17 to 34) and older adults (aged 60 to 82) participants.
Participants received extensive practice on a noun-pair task in which
they could use a visual-scanning strategy or a memory-retrieval
strategy. Older adults were more likely to use the scanning strategy.
Age differences were reduced when comparisons were made only for
participants using a retrieval strategy. Associative memory was
predictive of learning on the task, and semantic-memory access speed was
predictive of practiced performance. Practiced performance on a
memory-search task that also required associative learning was
predictive of practiced noun-pair performance. Models of
ability-performance relationships for skill acquisition are discussed.
View
Full Paper (.pdf) 3.6 mb [Available
through Internet Explorer 5.0 and higher or Netscape 7.1 only]
Request a paper copy
When you click the link,
your preferred email client such as Outlook or Thunderbird
will open. Please include your name and a method for us to contact you
in all correspondence.
Hertzog., C., Cooper, B. P., & Fisk, A. D. (1996). Aging and
individual differences in the development of skilled memory search
performance. Psychology and Aging, 11, 497-520.

Abstract

We examined individual differences in measures of
multiple intellectual abilities and performance on a pure memory search
task over 5 experimental sessions. Old (n = 104) and young (n = 97)
participants showed expected patterns of substantial improvement in
meory search intercepts and slopes in consistenly mapped (CM)
conditions, relative to varied mapping (VM) conditions. Initial
(unskilled) CM and VM memory search was highly correlated with a
Semantic Memory Access Speed factor and moderatley correlated with
General Intelligence. Structural equation models showed that measures of
Semantic Memory Access remained a strong predictor of skilled CM search
performance in both age groups despite individual differences in CM
memory search performance changes. These results indicate qualitative
differences in the nature of automatically between memory search and
visual search and suggest age invariance in the mechanisms determinging
automaticity in memory search.
View
Full Paper (.pdf) 3.5 mb [Available
through Internet Explorer 5.0 and higher or Netscape 7.1 only]
Request a paper copy
When you click the link,
your preferred email client such as Outlook or Thunderbird
will open. Please include your name and a method for us to contact you
in all correspondence.
Rogers, W. A., Fisk, A. D., & Hertzog. C. (1994). Do
ability-performance relationships differentiate age and practice effects
in visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 20, 710-738.

Abstract

Relationships between abilities and performance in
visual search were investigated for young and old adults. Ss received
extensive practice on category search task. A consistent version allowed
development of an automatic attention response; a varied version allowed
general performance improvements. Transfer conditions assessed learning.
General ability, induction, semantic knowledge, working memory,
perceptual speed, semantic memory access, and psychomotor speed were
accessed. LISREL models revealed that general ability and semantic
memory access predicted initial performance for both ages. Improvements
on both the consistent and varied tasks were predicted by perceptual
speed. Ability-performance relationships indexed performance changes but
were not predictive of learning (i.e., automatic process vs. general
efficiency). Qualitative differences in the ability-transfer models
suggest age differences in learning.
View
Full Paper (.pdf) 4.8 mb [Available
through Internet Explorer 5.0 and higher or Netscape 7.1 only]
Request a paper copy
When you click the link,
your preferred email client such as Outlook or Thunderbird
will open. Please include your name and a method for us to contact you
in all correspondence.

|